Permitted, with conditions
NCHSAA athletes may sign NIL agreements under State Board of Education Rule 16 NCAC 06E .0211. Every condition below must be met, and the full contract must be disclosed before signing.
Compliance
High school NIL is legal in North Carolina and banned for public-school athletes in South Carolina. Everything below is sourced to the governing bodies’ own documents — because eligibility is the one thing no deal is worth losing.
North and South Carolina are documented here in full because they are our home states. High school NIL is governed state by state, and the rules are not close to uniform. For athletes elsewhere in the Southeast we work from that state’s own association handbook and confirm every requirement in writing before anything is signed.
NCHSAA athletes may sign NIL agreements under State Board of Education Rule 16 NCAC 06E .0211. Every condition below must be met, and the full contract must be disclosed before signing.
The SCHSL amended its amateur-status bylaw for 2025–26: “A student may not earn compensation from the use of their name, image, and likeness.” No exceptions, no disclosure path.
SCISA schools operate under their own Blue Book, which allows NIL activity provided it stays separate from interscholastic athletics and uses no school marks.
North Carolina · NCHSAA
Per the NCHSAA's official NIL Packet, an agreement is compliant only if all of the following are true.
Source: NCHSAA Name, Image and Likeness and the NCHSAA NIL Packet, January 2025.
Prohibited categories
An NIL agreement may not require an NCHSAA student-athlete to promote or endorse any of these, regardless of how the money is structured. We screen every inbound offer against this list before it reaches the family.
The disclosure chain
The proposed agreement must be disclosed to all of the following before it is entered into. The NCHSAA has no numeric grace period — the disclosure precedes the signature.
Non-boarding parochial schools are exempt from this one.
Or the governing body of the membership entity.
Any sport the athlete will play during the term of the agreement.
Certification of Compliance, the full unredacted contract, and NFHS course certificates. “The NCHSAA cannot accept an NIL packet if the contract has any redacted information.”
South Carolina
The South Carolina High School League amended Article III, Section 14 (Amateur Status) for the 2025–26 school year to state that a student may not earn compensation from the use of their name, image and likeness. The change was compelled by a state budget proviso barring public districts from affiliating with any association that permits NIL compensation.
One narrow carve-out survives: an athlete may still accept a standard fee for instructing, supervising or officiating in an organized youth program not operated by a member school or the SCHSL.
The South Carolina Independent School Association's 2025–26 Blue Book takes the opposite position: a student-athlete may retain eligibility and engage in NIL activities for financial gain, provided the NIL activity and their participation in interscholastic athletics remain separate.
For a South Carolina family, the single most consequential compliance fact is which association their school belongs to. That is the first question we ask.
Sources: SCHSL 2025–26 By-laws, Article III §14, SCHSL approved budget provisos, Sports Illustrated and the SCISA 2025–26 Blue Book.
Athlete-agent law
Both Carolinas regulate athlete agents by statute, entirely separately from the high school NIL rules. North Carolina's Uniform Athlete Agents Act requires registration with the Secretary of State — with an explicit exemption for a student-athlete's spouse, parent, sibling or guardian. Cameron Dollar advises his brother Jaxon as a sibling, within that exemption.
South Carolina is stricter and, in the sources we have reviewed, contains no comparable family exemption. Its definition of athlete agent is broad, its registration fees are high, and unregistered solicitation of a student-athlete is a misdemeanor. Its NIL agency contracts cap agent compensation at 20% of contract value, and any agency contract with a minor must be signed by the parent or guardian with a 14-day right to cancel.
So we are precise about what we are. Dollar Performance provides NIL education, deal preparation, brand strategy and athletic development. Where an engagement would constitute athlete-agent activity under either state's statute, we say so up front and bring in properly registered or licensed professionals.
Sources: N.C. Gen. Stat. §78C-88, the NC Secretary of State Athlete Agent office, Eldreth Law's summary of the NC exemption, S.C. Code Title 59, Chapter 102, SC Department of Consumer Affairs and S.C. Code §59-102-100.
| Association | NIL allowed | Disclosure required |
|---|---|---|
| NCHSAA (NC public & member) | Yes, with conditions | Yes, before signing |
| SCHSL (SC public) | No | Not applicable |
| SCISA (SC private) | Yes, kept separate | Not specified in bylaws |
The college transition
Most firms will tell a family the college system is settled now that the House settlement is in place. It is not. Understanding exactly how unsettled it is happens to be one of the more valuable things we do.
The College Sports Commission was created to police this. A year in, the people running it say plainly that it has not gotten where it needs to be. Its chief executive, Bryan Seeley, has said he assumed the settlement rules were settled and that his job would be enforcing them — and instead found much of the role was redefining and interpreting rules while schools moved faster than the regulations did. Athletic directors have said out loud that the commission can only go so far on its own.
The clearinghouse itself is under strain. NIL Go was not built for the volume it received: review times stretched out, deals came back repeatedly for more information, and roughly $90 million in third-party deals sat uncleared as of June 30, 2026. When deals get denied, athletes push back — eighteen Nebraska football players contested denials totaling more than a million dollars, and an arbitrator upheld the denials. Meanwhile the conferences themselves have been publicly frustrated with enforcement gaps around tampering, eligibility waivers and the roster spending cap, with one account of the current market quoting a school official describing the workarounds in far blunter terms than any of us would put in writing.
None of that is an invitation to ignore the rules. It is the opposite. When enforcement is inconsistent and interpretations move, the athletes who get hurt are the ones who assumed somebody else was watching. A deal that cleared for a teammate last spring is not proof yours will clear this fall, and a practice nobody was penalized for is not the same thing as a practice that is permitted.
College football is expanding and rewriting its own rulebook while the season runs. Guidance issued in one window has been revised by the next. Any advisor claiming to have this permanently figured out is telling you something that cannot be true.
We read the commission’s guidance memos as they are issued, follow the disputes and arbitration outcomes, and update what we tell families the same week it changes rather than at the end of a season.
Being small is the advantage here. There is no committee between a rule changing and our athletes hearing about it. When the framework shifts mid-season, we adapt in days and tell you exactly what changed and what it costs you.
What we will never do. We will not build a family’s plan around the assumption that a rule will go unenforced. Weak enforcement is a risk to manage, not a strategy to use. Every deal we take to a college athlete is submitted, documented and defensible on the day it is signed — because the enforcement environment three years from now is not the one we are standing in today.
Seeley’s comments on interpreting rather than merely enforcing rules, and Oklahoma athletic director Roger Denny’s remarks on the commission’s limits, are reported by The Athletic. NIL Go review-time strain and the volume of associated-entity deals are reported by The Athletic; that report also records more than 21,000 deals worth $166.5 million approved and 711 worth $29.3 million unapproved as of the end of February 2026. The approximately $90 million in third-party deals uncleared as of June 30, 2026 is reported by Reuters, which also notes third-party deals remain uncapped while institutional payments sit under a cap of just over $20 million annually. The arbitrator’s decision upholding the denial of eighteen Nebraska players’ deals is reported by The Athletic. Conference frustration over tampering, eligibility and roster-cap enforcement is reported by Yahoo Sports. Current commission guidance is published by the College Sports Commission. Conditions described here are as of September 2026 and are expected to change.
Already been offered a deal?
We will read the agreement, tell you what is wrong with it, and tell you what has to be filed before it can be signed — whether or not you ever become a client.